Sandbox

From Classes
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "'''Problem 1.''' We say that $m$ is the maximum of a set $A$ if $m\in A$ and $m\geq a$ for all $a\in A$. Suppose a set $A$ of real numbers has a maximum, call it $m$. Show th...")
 
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
Hint: This is not as easy as it may look at first glance.
 
Hint: This is not as easy as it may look at first glance.
 +
 +
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.wolfram.com/cdf-player/plugin/v2.1/cdfplugin.js"></script>
 +
<script type="text/javascript">
 +
var cdf = new cdfplugin();
 +
cdf.embed('http://helmut.knaust.info/NB/Bungee.cdf', 777, 943);
 +
</script>

Revision as of 22:11, 14 October 2013

Problem 1. We say that $m$ is the maximum of a set $A$ if $m\in A$ and $m\geq a$ for all $a\in A$.

Suppose a set $A$ of real numbers has a maximum, call it $m$. Show that $m$ is also the supremum of $A$.


Problem 2. Let $A=\{x\in\mathbb{Q}\ |\ x^2\leq 3\}$. Show that A is bounded from above, but that $A$ has no maximum.


Problem 3. Let $A$ and $B$ be two sets of real numbers.

  1. Assume that $\emptyset\neq A\subseteq B$ and that $B$ is bounded from above. Show that $A$ is bounded from above, and moreover that $\sup A\leq \sup B$.
  2. State a similar theorem for sets that are bounded from below. (No proof required.)


Problem 4. A set is called bounded if it is bounded from above and bounded from below. Assume that every non-empty bounded set of real numbers has both an infimum and a supremum. Show that this implies the Completeness Axiom for the Real Numbers.

Hint: This is not as easy as it may look at first glance.

<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.wolfram.com/cdf-player/plugin/v2.1/cdfplugin.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> var cdf = new cdfplugin(); cdf.embed('http://helmut.knaust.info/NB/Bungee.cdf', 777, 943); </script>

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox