Most of the material presented here can be found in the wonderful and very readable book
Joseph H. Silverman, A Friendly Introduction to Number Theory, Prentice-Hall, 1997.
Definition: A positive integer is called a prime number, if it has exactly 2 divisors (1 and itself).
7 is prime, since 1 and 7 are the only divisors of 7.
15 is composite (not prime), since 15=3×5.
1 is not a prime number.
Here is a list of the first 100 prime numbers:
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_2.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_2.gif)
Theorem (Euclid): There are infinitely many prime numbers.
Proof.
Suppose is a complete list of all prime numbers.
Consider Clearly
is not divisible by any of the primes
.
Either is a prime number itself (a contradiction;
is not on the list
. Why?), or
is divisible by a number other than one of the listed primes, and thus divisible by a prime number not on the list
, a contradiction as well.
Actually, both possibilities can occur. Here is the list of the first ten prime numbers:
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_14.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_14.gif)
Multiplying them and adding 1 yields a composite number, whose prime factors are not on the list:
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_16.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_16.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_18.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_18.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_20.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_20.gif)
This means 6469693231=331 × 571 × 34231.
The list of the first 11 prime numbers yields a prime number:
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_22.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_22.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_24.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_24.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_26.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_26.gif)
How rare are prime numbers?
More precisely, one can ask about the behavior of the function π(x), the number of prime numbers less than or equal to x.
Here is a plot of this function:
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_28.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_28.gif)
Gauss and Legendre both conjectured the following:
Prime Number Theorem (Hadamard and Vallee-Poussin, 1896):
For large ,
behaves asymptotically like the function
.
Here is a plot of their quotient .
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_34.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_34.gif)
Here is a curious fact. If we consider small primes ,
-1 turns out to be prime, too:
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_38.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_38.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_40.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_40.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_42.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_42.gif)
What's wrong with this list? 11 is missing!
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_44.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_44.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_46.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_46.gif)
Definition: A prime number of the form -1 is called a Mersenne prime.
In this case, is called a Mersenne exponent.
Why are these numbers called Mersenne primes? Marin Mersenne boldly claimed in 1644 that a complete list of Mersenne exponents less than 258 is given by
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_50.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_50.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_52.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_52.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_54.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_54.gif)
Two of his conjectured exponents don't work; moreover he missed 89 and 107. Here is the correct list:
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_56.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_56.gif)
The fact that -1 is indeed prime, was proved by Lucas in 1876. The next Mersenne exponents were only found with the help of a computer by Robinson in 1952.
Let me list is a result we have already , at least partially, tacitly assumed:
Theorem: If -1 is prime, then
=2 and
is prime.
Proof.
I will only prove that -1 prime implies that
is prime.
Assume that is not prime, then
, with
.
So -1 =
-1.
Do you remember how to factor -1?
-1 "works" the same way:
-1 =
-1) ×
+
+
+1).
End of the story! -1 is divisible by
-1), and hence not prime.
Definition: A number is called perfect, if it equals the sum of its proper divisors.
6 and 28 are the smallest perfect numbers:
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_79.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_79.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_81.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_81.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_83.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_83.gif)
Now notice that ×
-1), and that 28 =
× (
-1). Is there a connection to Mersenne primes? You bet! Let's try this for the Mersenne prime
-1:
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_90.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_90.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_92.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_92.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_94.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_94.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_96.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_96.gif)
It is in fact true, that every Mersenne prime yields a perfect number:
Theorem (Euclid): If -1 is prime, then
-1) is perfect.
Proof.
Let's set -1. Note that
is prime.
All we have to do is to sum up the proper divisors of ×
.
Here is a complete list of the proper divisors:.
The geometric series formula tells us their sums: =
-1, and
.
Thus the sum of the proper divisors of ×
is given by
-1) +
-1)
=
-1)
×
is a perfect number.
What about the converse? It is "half" true:
Theorem (Euler): If is an even perfect number, then
-1) for some Mersenne prime
So, searching for even perfect numbers is equivalent to searching for Mersenne primes.
It is not known whether there are odd perfect numbers; there are none less than
How many Mersenne primes are known? As of this date (March 1999) there are 37 known Mersenne primes.Their exponents are listed below:
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_122.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_122.gif)
1 | 2 |
2 | 3 |
3 | 5 |
4 | 7 |
5 | 13 |
6 | 17 |
7 | 19 |
8 | 31 |
9 | 61 |
10 | 89 |
11 | 107 |
12 | 127 |
13 | 521 |
14 | 607 |
15 | 1279 |
16 | 2203 |
17 | 2281 |
18 | 3217 |
19 | 4253 |
20 | 4423 |
21 | 9689 |
22 | 9941 |
23 | 11213 |
24 | 19937 |
25 | 21701 |
26 | 23209 |
27 | 44497 |
28 | 86243 |
29 | 110503 |
30 | 132049 |
31 | 216091 |
32 | 756839 |
33 | 859433 |
34 | 1257787 |
35 | 1398269 |
36 | 2976221 |
37 | 3021377 |
![[Graphics:Images/mersenne_gr_123.gif]](Images/mersenne_gr_123.gif)
Why do people hunt for Mersenne primes?
- Mersenne primes are usually the biggest primes known.
- Deciding whether -1 is a Mersenne prime, is relatively easy. In fact, Lehmer refined the procedure Lucas had used to determine whether 127 was a Mersenne exponent into what is known as the Lucas-Lehmer test for Mersenne numbers. It takes "only a few days" on a Pentium PC to test one exponent in the current range of interest.
- Everyone with spare computer time can join!
Welcome to GIMPS, the "reat Internet Mersenne Prime Search"!
The GIMPS status page.